‘We needed to cease the undertaking as a result of we needed to deliver collectively a lot of events (together with buyers and the provincial authorities),’ says Leo de Bever, chairman of Nauticol.

Article content material
When huge plans crumble, it does not take lengthy for the inquiries to fly.
Commercial 2
Article content material
With the demise of Nauticol Power’s $4-billion methanol plant close to Grande Prairie, that cycle has now begun.
Article content material
“What we would prefer to know is whether or not the federal government has performed every part it could possibly,” stated Kathleen Ganley, NDP power critic.
“The federal government owes Albertans a proof, to inform them that they did not simply let this funding disappear, they did not simply let these jobs disappear.”
The Grand Prairie Day by day Herald Tribune reported Friday that the long-awaited petrochemical undertaking had stalled and wouldn’t proceed.
Leo de Bever, chairman of Nauticol, stated in an interview that the undertaking’s idea is sound.
Nevertheless, the personal firm didn’t have the funds for to finish the work wanted to advance it far sufficient for the proponents to succeed in the purpose of constructing a remaining funding determination.
Commercial 3
Article content material
“We needed to cease the undertaking as a result of we needed to deliver collectively a lot of events (together with buyers and the provincial authorities). And it seems that one of many events didn’t fulfill their dedication — let’s put it this manner — and we ran out of time,” he stated in an interview.
“It is performed. We principally needed to shut the undertaking as a result of even to maintain negotiating, to maintain it going, you want cash.”
In 2018, plans for a $2-billion methanol manufacturing advanced have been initially introduced by Calgary-based Nauticol Power, which aimed to construct the ability close to Grande Prairie.
If constructed, the undertaking is anticipated to show 300 million cubic ft of pure gasoline per day into 3.4 million tons of methanol yearly, which is utilized in gasoline, electronics and a lot of different petrochemical merchandise.
Commercial 4
Article content material

The NDP authorities on the time needed to develop the province’s petrochemical sector and was keen to supply incentives to firms that would add extra worth to Alberta’s sources.
On the eve of a 2019 provincial election marketing campaign, then-premier Rachel Notley introduced Alberta would offer the undertaking with $80 million in future royalty tax credit — after the advanced is constructed.
Mark Tonner, chief government of Nauticol, stated the help was “critically necessary” for the event.
After the pandemic in 2020, modifications have been made to the undertaking.
Tonner instructed the Monetary Publish the next 12 months that the corporate wanted to shift the plant’s design and make a “huge transfer to net-zero” emissions.
It determined to include carbon seize and storage know-how into the event and retailer as much as a million tons of CO2 underground yearly.
Commercial 5
Article content material
A information launch on the time stated the partnership would assist create as much as 5,000 development jobs and tons of extra for the many years it will likely be in operation.
Noting that one of many quickest rising international markets for its “blue methanol” was within the marine sector, Nauticol unveiled a three way partnership partnership to market its product in Singapore.
The undertaking’s price ticket has risen to about $4 billion.
De Bever, previously CEO of the Alberta Funding Administration Corp., stated the cash wanted to advance the undertaking far sufficient to make a remaining funding determination can be a number of p.c of the entire price of constructing the been advanced.

In the end unable to succeed in that time, a call was made late final 12 months to finish the undertaking and the corporate “principally folded,” he stated.
Commercial 6
Article content material
“It is not one thing that is very enjoyable, however a mix of delays from COVID, and it is a undertaking the place you needed to deliver collectively events that are not used to working collectively, which created further hurdles for us, ” he stated.
And what in regards to the function of the province?
Petrochemical initiatives are a part of an business that the province remains to be actively making an attempt to broaden.
In 2020, the UCP authorities launched the Alberta Petrochemicals Incentive Program (APIP), which gives grants value 12 p.c of a undertaking’s capital price.
“Assist was supplied a number of occasions, however ultimately it wasn’t there,” de Bever stated, noting that the provincial incentive program solely gives assist as soon as such amenities are operational.
Commercial 7
Article content material
“In a undertaking like this . . . you want the help of the federal government to say, ‘Sure, we wish this to occur.’ You want some assist financially. You want the monetary sector to do its factor. You want the working firms that offer the gasoline to do their factor. . . Most of these issues have been in place.
“However ultimately you continue to have to lift the cash to return to a remaining funding determination.”
-
From 2018: Alberta joins petrochemicals growth with $2 billion methanol undertaking proposal
-
From 2021: Nauticol on observe to supply first net-zero methanol as new applied sciences achieve momentum in Alberta
In a press release, Alberta Power stated the undertaking didn’t obtain any grants, however the firm did apply by way of APIP and acquired “superior notification approval” that the event meets program pointers.
Commercial 8
Article content material
The corporate has not made any approaches to Alberta Power for financing previously 12 months, the assertion stated.
“As a province, we stepped up with the petrochemical incentive program, which is a vital program,” stated Finance Minister Travis Toews, who can be MLA for Grand Prairie-Wapiti.
“We actually felt we did our half. Look, I do know it has been a troublesome couple of years on the market in capital markets, all of the uncertainty with the collapse of power costs and the disruption in provide chains. And I believe that was a part of the problem for Nauticol.”
Can the undertaking be revived?
At this stage, De Bever will not be so certain.
“I’ve no cause to consider that it may be resurrected, however I do not know,” he added.
“It was a very good undertaking. So I do not remorse it. And we gave our greatest and we could not deliver everybody collectively.”
Chris Varcoe is a Calgary Herald columnist.
cvarcoe@postmedia.com