Article content material
Infamous anti-vaxxer and one-time Calgary mayoral candidate Kevin J. Johnston should pay a public well being inspector he regularly harassed and defamed $650,000 in damages, a Calgary choose says.
Article content material
In a written determination launched Thursday, Choose Colin Feasby mentioned Johnston’s relentless marketing campaign in opposition to Sarah Nunn warranted a considerable award of compensation.
Article content material
However the Court docket of King’s Bench choose mentioned he was not assured Johnston would pay the high-quality, and in addition ordered the Calgary man completely restrained from related conduct directed on the well being inspector.
“Whereas I’ve awarded damages for these causes of motion, Mr. Johnston is unrepentant, and I’ve no confidence that the damages award will act as any form of disincentive for him to proceed to defame and harass Ms. Nunn,” wrote Feasby.
“Certainly, the truth that he has not paid a major earlier defamation award suggests to me that monetary penalties are inadequate to punish Mr. inspire Johnston to alter his conduct. Accordingly, I conclude {that a} everlasting injunction is a simply and acceptable treatment obligatory to forestall Mr. Johnston continues to m. to slander and harass Nunn.”
Feasby famous that Johnston has repeatedly defamed the general public well being inspector on his on-line speak present and in feedback to mainstream media.
“The proof reviewed earlier in these causes exhibits that Mr. Johnston repeatedly about Ms. Nunn spoke in segments on his on-line speak present. He used pejoratives corresponding to ‘terrorists’ and ‘fascists’ to insult Ms. to explain Nunn,” Feasby mentioned.
“He has me. mocked Nunn and her household as he confirmed pictures of them harvested from her social media accounts. And, as mentioned earlier in these causes, Mr. Johnston’s statements are fairly interpreted as inciting his followers to violence in opposition to Ms. Nunn and her household. This conduct was harassing and Mr. Johnston knew or ought to have recognized it was unwelcome.”
