Canada and the U.S. have been waging battle over country-of-origin labelling for meat since 2008
Article content material
New meat labelling guidelines within the U.S. may harm Alberta and Canadian meat exports to its southern neighbour — and can probably increase costs for U.S. shoppers, consultants say.
Canada and america’ long-standing battle over country-of-origin labelling (COOL) for meat merchandise entered a brand new chapter on Monday, with the Biden administration saying a brand new rule that “Product of USA” or “Made within the USA” labels can solely be used when the animals are born, raised, slaughtered and processed within the U.S.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Article content material
Beneath present rules, cattle born and raised in Canada, then transported and slaughtered within the U.S., might be labelled as being from the U.S. Some American associations have additionally raised considerations that cattle slaughtered and processed in nations similar to Mexico might be repackaged upon arrival to the U.S. and given the “Made in USA” label.
The rule is voluntary, that means meat producers aren’t required to make use of the labelling, mentioned america Division of Agriculture. The division mentioned the rule, taking impact in 2026, will prohibit deceptive claims about the place meat was sourced.
But when sufficient U.S. meat producers undertake “Made in USA” packaging, Canadian producers may see their cross-border exports drop, mentioned Dennis Laycraft, govt vice-president of the Canadian Cattle Affiliation (CCA). The CCA on Monday known as the principles “onerous.”
“It comes again to how many individuals are literally going to provide beef utilizing the ‘Product of USA’ label,” Laycraft mentioned. “As we get nearer to implementation and individuals are arranging product to fulfill that definition, we could begin to see (the impact).”
Midday Information Roundup
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Really helpful from Editorial
-
Why drought on the prairies is making your steak dearer
-
Alberta’s drought may hinder Canadian beef business’s potential to additional scale back emissions
The impact could possibly be harshly felt in Alberta, house to just about 50 per cent of Canada’s beef cows. Giant numbers of Alberta cattle are despatched south for slaughter at a decrease value in comparison with sending them throughout the nation to areas in Ontario, for instance.
Canada final yr exported $5.7 billion in cattle to the U.S. and $4.85 billion the earlier yr, in line with the CCA. Greater than half of Canada’s beef exports go to the U.S., Laycraft mentioned.
Canada’s agriculture minister and worldwide commerce minister mentioned in a joint assertion they’re disillusioned within the choice and can increase it at a trilateral assembly with the U.S. and Mexico in March.
U.S. associations approve of choice
Associations within the U.S. celebrated the choice, with one among that nation’s largest cattle associations calling it the top of an “period of client deception.”
“Not will multinational meat packers be allowed to trick shoppers into believing that overseas beef was produced by United States cattle farmers and ranchers,” Invoice Bullard, CEO of R-CALF USA, mentioned in an announcement.
Commercial 4
Article content material
Whereas Bullard known as it a “good step,” he additionally known as on Congress to make the label requirement necessary.
R-CALF’s request for tighter restrictions comes with its personal historical past. The battle over country-of-origin labelling dates again to 2008 when the U.S. authorities made it necessary for all meat to be labelled with the nation through which it was born, raised and slaughtered.
When the necessary rule was applied in 2008, inside every week Canadian cattle producers went from having 17 U.S. slaughter vegetation accepting Canadian cattle to simply seven, with some solely accepting cattle sure days of the week to make sure they had been segregated from American cattle.
The U.S. repealed the rule in 2015 when the World Commerce Group (WTO) decided the U.S. violated worldwide commerce regulation, a choice that got here because of Canada’s problem.
Extra commerce ‘will result in extra inexpensive meals’
However the U.S. route on country-of-origin labelling has remained a reside subject, mentioned Carlo Dade, director of commerce and commerce infrastructure on the Calgary-based Canada West Basis, a non-partisan think-tank.
Commercial 5
Article content material
Dade argued the principles are, to some extent, an try to provide American meat producers better market share. Ought to numerous producers take up the “Made in USA” labelling, Canadian exports will probably drop and drive up costs of meat for Individuals, he added.
“I don’t suppose this voluntary labelling will work,” he mentioned. “It’ll simply be too costly — beef that’s solely produced from cattle raised within the U.S. is far more costly than beef that’s produced by means of the built-in provide chains.”
It’s not clear whether or not there’s an immense urge for food amongst U.S. shoppers for America-made merchandise which might be dearer, in comparison with meat sourced exterior of the States, Dade mentioned.
Sylvain Charlebois, director of the Agri-Meals Analytics Lab at Dalhousie College, mentioned the principles are extra average and versatile than their predecessor however “will deliver some pointless heartaches.”
“You need to commerce extra. You don’t need to discourage anybody from buying and selling as a result of buying and selling will result in extra inexpensive meals on either side of the border,” he mentioned.
Whereas Canada may problem the rule, Dade mentioned its voluntary standing makes it a non-tariff commerce barrier, which might make Canada’s potential argument to the WTO much less compelling.
“Taking one thing from (necessary to voluntary) actually weakens the argument we’ve used prior to now,” Dade mentioned.
mscace@postmedia.com
X: @mattscace67
Article content material
