Article content material
Albertans beware: Failure to make an insurance coverage declare will end result within the lack of even reputable damages.
Article content material
The Alberta Courtroom of Enchantment dominated Monday that attempting to trick your insurer into paying for additional protection will negate all the coverage.
Article content material
A 3-member Courtroom of Enchantment panel upheld a decrease court docket determination that discovered Calgarian Ali Alreda Abbas was not entitled to any protection from Esurance Insurance coverage Firm of Canada.
The judges mentioned that King’s Financial institution decide Justice Barbara Johnston overturned a choice which mentioned the corporate should cowl Abbas for a part of his declare.
Abbas was injured as a passenger in a automotive pushed by an uninsured driver.
Because of this, Esurance was obligated to cowl him for bodily accidents coated within the accident.
However in his declare, Abbas additionally sought protection for misplaced wages. The one downside: Abbas lied about his employment.
Article content material
“The insured admitted that he lied within the kind he submitted to help his utility,” Justice Jack Watson and Justice Thomas Wakeling wrote in writing their written determination.
Decide Jolaine Antonio wrote a separate determination, however agreed along with her fellow judges that the attraction needs to be dismissed.
The judges mentioned a piece of the Insurance coverage Act permits insurers to refuse any cowl the place fraud is tried.
Of their determination, Watson and Wakeling mentioned that granting Abbas protection for the reputable portion of his declare “would encourage fraudsters to make false claims as a result of there can be no antagonistic impact on the fraudster if the insurer detected the fraud. “
Abbas admitted he lied on his declare, however his lawyer argued an interpretation of the Insurance coverage Act would permit him to hunt protection for statutory damages even when he was denied different protection attributable to fraud.
Citing a earlier case, the judges mentioned “the defrauding insured shouldn’t be allowed to assume: If the fraud is profitable, I’ll win; whether it is unsuccessful, I’ll lose nothing.”
KMartin@postmedia.com
Twitter: @KMartinCourts
