Opinion: False equivalencies are hurting the housing conversation

Article content material

Hire management laws gained’t flip Alberta into B.C. or Ontario; it is likely to be the one likelihood we now have to forestall that from taking place.

Rents are hovering, vacancies are dwindling, college students are sleeping of their automobiles, and households are compelled to decide on between maintaining the lights on and placing meals on the desk. It’s troubling that Alberta continues to face alone as the biggest province in Canada with out some kind of safety in opposition to dramatic hire will increase.

Article content material

Article content material

Prior to now couple of months, I’ve heard many tales from Albertans who’ve skilled hire will increase of 20, 30 and even 50 per cent. I heard from a senior dwelling on a set revenue whose hire elevated by $1,800 a month. Amid a housing and affordability disaster, Albertans are determined to catch their breath. Invoice 205: The Housing Safety Act would give Albertans that likelihood.

Arguments in opposition to Invoice 205 typically depend on a comparability to provinces comparable to B.C. and Ontario, which have hire caps and still have the very best hire costs within the nation. Critics level to those provinces’ excessive hire costs as proof in opposition to the efficacy of hire management. However that argument fails to have in mind one of the crucial fundamental rules of analysis methodology: correlation doesn’t equal causation.

B.C. and Ontario wouldn’t have the very best rents within the nation as a result of they’ve hire management. The truth is, hire management in each provinces has been used to assist preserve already excessive rents from growing at astronomical charges. And Alberta, a province with no hire management, constantly has the cities with the quickest growing hire within the nation.

Article content material

Article content material

The suggestion that hire caps in these provinces preceded and immediately brought about their excessive hire costs, and that introducing hire caps right here would end in Alberta mirroring B.C. and Ontario, is a false equivalence. It’s essentially flawed and categorically unfaithful. And I concern that by perpetuating these false equivalencies, we danger doing nothing in any respect, which at this price would lead Alberta to achieve and even surpass the unaffordability ranges seen in these provinces.

One other level missed when evaluating Alberta to B.C. and Ontario is the absence of emptiness management. Emptiness management ensures that hire enhance caps apply equally to vacant items, stopping landlords from exploiting turnover to unfairly elevate rents. Hire caps with out emptiness management permit landlords to take advantage of loopholes comparable to fixed-term leases to avoid hire caps, resulting in elevated evictions and tenants being trapped in unaffordable housing conditions. At present, B.C. and Ontario wouldn’t have emptiness management; nonetheless, if Invoice 205 passes, Alberta’s short-term hire cap would come with this vital measure.

Article content material

Critics of Invoice 205 are likely to advocate for a similar answer: growing housing provide. On this, we agree. The truth is, Invoice 205 is designed to make sure Albertans see extra housing provide, relatively than merely the promise of it.

Alberta’s housing disaster and affordability disaster have been met with a variety of damaged guarantees. Albertans had been promised a tax credit score to alleviate the stress of rising prices of dwelling, however they had been then advised the credit score wasn’t coming. And regardless of promising to extend hire dietary supplements by 1,200 households per yr, the UCP solely elevated hire dietary supplements by 550 households.

One of the vital elements of Invoice 205 is that it requires the federal government to set housing targets and publicly report on their progress so we are able to actually sort out this housing disaster.

We have now to maintain speaking in regards to the housing disaster if we would like any likelihood of fixing it, however false equivalencies and surface-level criticisms are hurting the dialog. Utilizing the examples of B.C. and Ontario to argue in opposition to hire caps fully misinterprets the connection between hire management and housing affordability, and overlooks how Invoice 205 differs from hire regulation seen in B.C. and Ontario.

We have to transfer the dialog ahead on housing, and to try this we have to suppose critically about all of the potential options.

Invoice 205: The Housing Safety Act is a private-member’s invoice introduced by MLA Janis Irwin and is at the moment being debated within the legislature.

Janis Irwin is the Opposition NDP critic for housing and MLA for Edmonton-Highlands-Norwood.

Article content material